THE RELEVANCE OF SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS' THOUGHTS IN EDUCATION IN THE ERA OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: BALANCE BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN VALUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62901/j-ikhsan.v4i2.296Keywords:
Educational ethics, Artificial intelligence, Thomas Aquinas, Humanistic values, Adaptive learningAbstract
This study explores the ethical integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education through the philosophical lens of Thomas Aquinas, addressing the tension between technological efficiency and humanistic values. While AI enhances personalized learning and accessibility (e.g., adaptive platforms like Khan Academy), it risks dehumanizing education by neglecting empathy and equity. Using qualitative philosophical analysis and systematic literature review, the research examines Aquinas’ principles of natural law, virtue ethics, and telos (purpose) to propose a framework balancing AI innovation with moral education. Findings reveal that Aquinas’ emphasis on reason, character formation, and social justice aligns with modern needs to mitigate AI’s pitfalls, such as data privacy concerns and reduced human interaction. The study concludes that AI should complement, not replace, human educators, with policies prioritizing ethical training, inclusive access, and curricula integrating Aquinas’ virtues (e.g., justice, empathy). This synthesis offers a holistic approach to ensure AI serves as a tool for human flourishing in education.
References
Aquinas, T. (n.d.). Summa Theologica. (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Benziger Bros
Aquinas, T. (. (n.d.). Summa Theologica. (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Benziger Bros. (1265–1274).
Brookings Institution. (n.d.). The risks of over-reliance on technology in education. Https://Www.Brookings.Edu.
Bungin, B. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologis ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer.
CASEL. (2020). Social and emotional learning outcomes: Meta-analysis. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
Character Education Partnership. (2018). The impact of character education on academic and behavioral outcomes. https://www.character.org.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Common Sense Media. (2021). Teens and social media pressure: Survey findings. https://www.commonsensemedia.org.
Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture. (2019). The role of character education in modern pedagogy. University of Virginia.
Kaelan. (2020). Metode penelitian filsafat. Yogyakarta: Paradigma Press.
Lickona, T. (2013). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam.
McKinsey & Company. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Market trends and ethical challenges. https://www.mckinsey.com.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
National Education Association. (2020). The impact of technology dependence on student social skills. https://www.nea.org.
OECD. (2021). ). Digital divide in education: Global disparities in technology access. https://www.oecd.org.
Patton, M. Q. (n.d.). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pew Research Center. (2021). Barriers to digital learning in U.S. schools. https://www.pewresearch.org.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Alfabeta.
UNESCO. (2020). Ethical frameworks for AI in education. https://en.unesco.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yanti Vidarosa Naibaho,, Antonius Remigius Abi, Megawati Naibaho, Hartati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









